Manual observation
An observer scores against your own criteria on phone or laptop, offline if the room has no signal. Structured, consistent, comparable across every teacher.
Structured, criterion-level observation built around your standards. Observe on-site, from video, or as a one-off, every finding scored against your own criteria, explained in plain words, and tracked to close.
Observation → Action
A visit produces a rating. A rating produces nothing. IMPACT scores every criterion against your own written expectations, explains what was seen in plain words, and turns the gaps into tasks somebody owns.
Planning and classroom climate are strong - the objective was written up, returned to, and students were comfortable being wrong out loud. The lesson lost ground on distribution: 18 of 23 questions went to the front two rows, and the written task was set as homework rather than attempted in the room.
Six minutes of writing before the discussion, and question from a seating list so the back rows enter the lesson.
Task assigned · Ms. Banerjee · weekly · re-checked at the next observation
Written for the teacher and the coordinator. No jargon, no decoding required.
On site, from a recording, or both. Each criterion is rated by choosing the written expectation that matches what happened.
Comments, photographs, student work and timecoded clips attach to the specific criterion they support.
Strengths, gaps and priorities written for the person receiving them - teacher, coordinator or board.
Weak parameters trigger recommended tasks with owners and dates. The next visit re-checks those criteria first.
An observer scores against your own criteria on phone or laptop, offline if the room has no signal. Structured, consistent, comparable across every teacher.
Upload a recording. Talk share, wait time, question spread and on-task trend measured exactly, with timecoded evidence and a confidence score on every flag.
A single focused window - one department or one grade band - when you need a clear verdict fast. Becomes your baseline if you continue.
Every cycle re-tests the same criteria. Growth is measured, not assumed.
Audit, assessment or video analysis against your defined criteria.
The engine identifies improvement areas, tied to specific criteria.
Tasks auto-created in the Task Manager, deadlines set, owners notified.
The auditee completes tasks; the manager rates quality of completion.
A partial re-audit on the same flagged criteria, fresh evidence.
Compare before / after. Reinforce growth, or escalate stalls.
Just the score
English · Class 7
…and then what?
What it says
Ananya understands what she reads and reasons about it well, comprehension is a real strength. Where she loses marks is in getting her thinking onto the page: her answers are shorter than her ideas. She needs practice turning good thinking into full, written answers.
Suggested next step
One short written response a week with a sentence-starter, and praise the explaining, not just the answer.
Written for a parent or a teacher. No jargon, no decoding required.
Bring IMPACT auditing to your institution, criterion-level evidence, explained and tracked to close.