Audits & Observation

Turn observation into action.

Structured, criterion-level observation built around your standards. Observe on-site, from video, or as a one-off, every finding scored against your own criteria, explained in plain words, and tracked to close.

Observation → Action

The same lesson,
finally in findings.

A visit produces a rating. A rating produces nothing. IMPACT scores every criterion against your own written expectations, explains what was seen in plain words, and turns the gaps into tasks somebody owns.

Just the visit
3.2/4
Ms. R. Banerjee · English · Class 7 B
Proficient · Level 3 of 4
EmergingDevelopingProficientExemplary
Previous
2.9
Change
+0.3
School avg
3.0
…and then what?
What it says

A well-planned lesson that four students carried

Planning and classroom climate are strong - the objective was written up, returned to, and students were comfortable being wrong out loud. The lesson lost ground on distribution: 18 of 23 questions went to the front two rows, and the written task was set as homework rather than attempted in the room.

14 criteria rated4 evidence files19:10 · 7m talk blockSelf vs observer +0.4
Suggested next step

Six minutes of writing before the discussion, and question from a seating list so the back rows enter the lesson.

Task assigned · Ms. Banerjee · weekly · re-checked at the next observation

Written for the teacher and the coordinator. No jargon, no decoding required.

How a visit becomes a result

Four steps. Nothing stops at a number.
Step 01

Observe

On site, from a recording, or both. Each criterion is rated by choosing the written expectation that matches what happened.

You getA rating that can be explained, not defended.
Step 02

Evidence

Comments, photographs, student work and timecoded clips attach to the specific criterion they support.

You getA finding nobody has to take on trust.
Step 03

Findings in words

Strengths, gaps and priorities written for the person receiving them - teacher, coordinator or board.

You getA report read in five minutes, not filed.
Step 04

Tasks that close

Weak parameters trigger recommended tasks with owners and dates. The next visit re-checks those criteria first.

You getChange you can evidence at year end.
  • MA

    Manual observation

    An observer scores against your own criteria on phone or laptop, offline if the room has no signal. Structured, consistent, comparable across every teacher.

    4 types · external, internal, peer, self
  • AI

    AI video observation

    Upload a recording. Talk share, wait time, question spread and on-task trend measured exactly, with timecoded evidence and a confidence score on every flag.

    No observer in the room · ratings confirmed by a human
  • 1X

    One-time audit

    A single focused window - one department or one grade band - when you need a clear verdict fast. Becomes your baseline if you continue.

    No platform commitment required
One engine · every settingBrowse templates & criteria →
The Cycle

A loop that keeps measuring.

Every cycle re-tests the same criteria. Growth is measured, not assumed.

  1. 1

    Observe

    Audit, assessment or video analysis against your defined criteria.

  2. 2

    Diagnose

    The engine identifies improvement areas, tied to specific criteria.

  3. 3

    Assign

    Tasks auto-created in the Task Manager, deadlines set, owners notified.

  4. 4

    Act & Rate

    The auditee completes tasks; the manager rates quality of completion.

  5. 5

    Re-measure

    A partial re-audit on the same flagged criteria, fresh evidence.

  6. 6

    Track Growth

    Compare before / after. Reinforce growth, or escalate stalls.

Score → Story

The same result, finally in words.

Just the score

72/100

English · Class 7

…and then what?

IMPACT reads it

What it says

Ananya · English · Class 7

Ananya understands what she reads and reasons about it well, comprehension is a real strength. Where she loses marks is in getting her thinking onto the page: her answers are shorter than her ideas. She needs practice turning good thinking into full, written answers.

Suggested next step

One short written response a week with a sentence-starter, and praise the explaining, not just the answer.

Written for a parent or a teacher. No jargon, no decoding required.

Audit what actually matters.

Bring IMPACT auditing to your institution, criterion-level evidence, explained and tracked to close.